Considering Risks to Researchers and Staff in Low-Resource Settings during Public Health Crises: A Proposed Conceptual Model.

Human subjects research protections have historically focused on mitigating risk of harm and promoting benefits for research participants. In many low-resource settings (LRS), complex and often severe challenges in daily living, poverty, geopolitical uprisings, sociopolitical, economic, and climate crises increase the burdens of even minimal risk research. While there has been important work to explore the scope of ethical responsibilities of researchers and research teams to respond to these wider challenges and hidden burdens in global health research, less attention has been given to the ethical dilemmas and risk experienced by frontline researcher staff as they perform research-related activities in LRS. Risks such as job insecurity, moral distress, infection, or physical harm can be exacerbated during public health crises, as recently highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We highlight the layers of risk research staff face in LRS and present a conceptual model to characterize drivers of this risk, with particular attention to public health crises. A framework by which funders, institutions, principal investigators, and/or research team leaders can systematically consider these additional layers of risk to researchers and frontline staff is an important and needed addition to routine research proposals and protocol review.

Perinatal COVID-19 outcomes: evaluating the strength of current evidence.

Purpose of the Study: Viral respiratory diseases, like those caused by novel strains of influenza and Coronaviridae, have historically disproportionately affected pregnant women and conferred increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Initial reports published from Wuhan, China identified only limited symptoms in pregnant women and no cases of mortality, but more recent reports from other regions of the world have reported contrasting information. The purpose of the study was to evaluate initially published cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women in China and compare them to subsequently published studies from the remainder of the world.Materials and Methods: This review curates 199 maternal published cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 initially reported in the literature from China and contrasts them to more recent literature reporting clinical findings and outcomes of 729 selected cases from the rest of the world, including the United States.Results: Overall, initial case reports and series from China reported no cases of maternal mortality, which contrasts with subsequent reports from other regions of the world demonstrating significant morbidity and mortality can and does occur in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2.Conclusion: While initial reports suggest limited risks of infection in pregnancy with SARS-CoV-2, subsequent findings have demonstrated pregnant women are at risk for severe morbidity and mortality. Case studies and series that are imperative in the early stages of a pandemic to provide data on a novel pathogen cannot be used to provide generalizable information predicting group risks.